SVALBARD: As the planet warms, the perpetually frozen soil known as permafrost that covers Alaska, Siberia and other parts of the Northern Hemisphere is slowly melting away.
Scientists are monitoring this with a growing sense of alarm because permafrost contains roughly 1.7 trillion tons of organic carbon dioxide from decayed plant debris trapped in the soil. Recent studies have found that carbon and methane released from permafrost could equal 40 percent of annual greenhouse gas emissions.
But melting permafrost also poses a much more immediate risk, one that is often overlooked by climatologists grappling with the potential emissions problem.
Approximately 34 percent of the world’s coastlines are covered in permafrost, which absorbs the impact of ocean waves and protects against coastal erosion. Sea ice helps too, by blocking waves from reaching the shore.
That buffer zone is disappearing, however, and without it coastal erosion could accelerate and threaten critical infrastructure – including oil and gas pipelines – in the Arctic and elsewhere, according to Aleksey Marchenko, a scientist studying the issue at the University Center in Svalbard.
“The main mechanism for coastal erosion [in the Arctic] is the melting of permafrost and increased storm activity,” said Marchenko, an expert in ice mechanics from Moscow.
Last year, Marchenko set up a custom-built sensor off the coast of Longyearbyen on Svalbard – an archipelago midway between Norway and the North Pole – to model the rate of coastal erosion in the region.
After waiting 12 months, Marchenko and his team of researchers recently fished the sensor out of the sea and took it back to the university lab for analysis.
Marchenko is still sifting through data. But he said he now believes the melting of permafrost plays a much larger role in hastening coastal erosion on Svalbard than initially believed.
More information needs to be gathered. It’s unclear, for instance, why permafrost melts faster in some places than others, and the rate of erosion on Svalbard remains unknown, according to a 2013 study by the Institute for Polar and Marine Research in Potsdam, Germany.
“The melting is inconsistent,” Marchenko said. “In one place it might be melting quickly, in another less quickly.”
Still, the findings could inform future development projects in Longyearbyen, where planners have proposed a new harbor near the town’s airport.
If the once-sturdy shoreline is susceptible to erosion, the design of the harbor and other planned waterfront infrastructure might have to be strengthened, Marchenko said, in order to account for the changing landscape.
And the implications for the oil and gas industry could be even more costly in regions where pipelines connected to offshore wells are buried in shoreline permafrost. Erosion activity fueled by permafrost melt could disturb the pipelines and even cause underground leaks, Marchenko said.
“Permafrost is very important for the structure of coastal zones,” said Marchenko. If permafrost coasts continue eroding, “it could create some catastrophic events.”
Approximately 34 percent of the world's coastlines are covered in permafrost.
Photo: Colin Rich
Aleksey Marchenko, right, is leading the UNIS research study on coastal erosion on Svalbard.
Photo: Colin Rich
On a recent afternoon, researchers retrieved a sensor that measured the impact that ocean waves have on the shoreline near Longyearbyen.
MURMANSK: Ecological groups gathered on Kola Peninsula fear that Barents nature will be the looser after Oslo decided to call off the environmental minister’s Moscow meeting in response to Russia’s annexation of Crimea.
TROMSØ: Since the first five specimens of snow crab were found in the Barents Sea in 1996, the population has exploded. There is now ten times as much snow crab than king crab in the area, and scientists are just starting to find out how this new species has adopted to life in the Barents Sea.
The current situation in Ukraine makes cross-border cooperation with the neighboring countries even more important, Barents Secretariat leader Rune Rafaelsen says. At the same time, Norway has joined NATO’s condemnation of Russia’s military escalation on the Crimea peninsula.
Board member Amund Trellevik in the press network fears entry-denial of Kremlin’s controversial propaganda-journalist Dmitry Kiselyov could be retaliated by refusing Norwegian journalists access to Russia.