The Arctic Council is an international forum for discussion and debate on important Arctic issues. Where it’s sometimes less successful is in reaching agreement.
But it now has one more binding agreement to its name. The Agreement on Cooperation on Marine Oil Pollution Preparedness and Response in the Arctic—the Council’s second ever binding agreement—was signed by all eight Arctic ministers this morning.
In the event of an oil spill anywhere in the ecologically sensitive Arctic region, this new agreement is the tool the circumpolar countries are hoping will help them work together to clean it up. It sets out guidelines for things like communicating between countries, coordinating personnel and figuring out who needs to do what.
Although the product of a Arctic Council task force, the agreement was negotiated by and agreed to by all eight countries.
It also means that the Arctic countries are required to notify each other should there be an oil spill—from any source—anywhere in the Arctic.
In a presentation after the Arctic Council ministerial meeting, Ambassador David Balton, an American marine conservation expert and the co-chair of the task force, said “the prospect of a potential oil spill event in the Arctic is very much on peoples minds.”
There’s no question that a changing Arctic means melting polar ice and a lot more open ocean. Which means, “we are anticipating—despite what some protesters may say—that there will be increased oil and gas development,” Balton said.
More oil and gas development means more tankers in Arctic waters, which means the possibility of an oil spill in the Arctic has moved beyond the hypothetical.
Although this is not the first agreement to attempt to sort out what happens when oil spills in international waters, Balton said it’s the first “pan-Arctic agreement” that combines duties and obligations for all the Arctic countries.
In other words, each country is committing itself to equip itself to respond to oil spills, meaning they will need things like equipment and plans for how they will respond.
Even if they don’t currently have these things.
Speaking for the United States, Balton said, “we are not fully ready to do what is necessary.” He adds, referring to the other Arctic countries, “I suspect we’re not alone in this.”
But the intent of the agreement is to spur countries to get serious about oil spills.
“We are hoping that the signing of this agreement will be the prompt to be ready.”
The agreement has been signed, now it’s up to each country to verify it internally, a process Balton is confident will happen within the year.
“It’s a compelling issue of our time,” he says, “we need to do a better job of being ready for any potential oil spill events in the Arctic.”
Russia’s only aircraft carrier, the Northern Fleet’s “Admiral Kuznetsov”, has finished repairs and is ready to leave the port of Murmansk. According to a Russian news agency, the vessel will sail to Syria.
A century and a half ago, Norway was home to roughly three thousand brown bears, the majority of bears in all of Scandinavia. By 1930, the bears were virtually extinct. Decades of aggressive management tactics and bounties had wiped out one of the area’s most iconic species.
Microplastics, the tiny plastic particles that are accumulating in marine waters and big lakes around the world, are now showing up in the Arctic waters south and southwest of Svalbard, Norway, a new study says.
REYKJAVIK: The climatic changes taking place in the Arctic are a call to action for the world. We must answer with more international cooperation and more research, says Tore Hattrem, State Secretary of Norway’s Foreign Ministry.
“Partnership should and shall shape the development of the Arctic, therefore cooperation is the starting point for our Arctic policy,” Vladimir Barbin, Senior Arctic Official and representative to the Arctic Council, said at the Arctic Circle 2015 assembly.
August 9th, the Barents Region celebrated the UN International Day of the World’s Indigenous Peoples. The day was commemorated in several parts of the region, including Karasjok in Northern Norway and Teriberka in Northwestern Russia.
Norway’s Foreign Minister Børge Brende has asked Russia for an explanation to the high number of asylum seekers coming to Norway via Russia. Syrian refugees that have lived in Russia for a long time, will be stopped on the border and sent back.