New tool for predicting sea ice extent could boost Arctic development
Environmentalists worry that increased industry presence near the ice edge could harm the important ecosystem there.(Photo: Jimmy Thomson)
A new study has demonstrated that the extent of meltwater ponds early in the year is a better predictor of minimum sea ice extent for that year than any other method. This could be big news for industries looking to reliably penetrate higher into the Arctic.
Every spring in the Arctic Ocean, the breakup of sea ice is preceded by the formation of meltwater ponds on top of the ice. Aside from visually representing global warming for calendars and reports, these beautiful meltwater ponds may have a valuable role to play in helping scientists predict the coming year’s minimum ice cover.
That could be big news for oil and gas and shipping companies eager for any accurate forecast of troublesome sea ice.
A new study in Nature Climate Change showed that while the Arctic sea ice has been shrinking in the summer, the size of the ponds on the ice has been growing proportionately. Measuring their size proved to be an effective tool for predicting how much or how little ice there would be in that year’s September minimum.
“We were surprised at how clear the link between this and late summer sea-ice extent is,” said lead author David Schröder in an interview with Phys.org.
This is no accident. The meltwater ponds actually play a major role in promoting the melting of the ice. Ponds cause the surface of the ice to absorb 20 percent more sunlight. So the water sitting on top of the ice warms the surrounding ice, causing a feedback loop and melting the ice faster.
In September 1996, when ice was at its highest level since satellites started recording sea ice extent in 1979, the ponds had covered just one tenth of the ice surface the previous July. In 2012, the meltwater ponds covered three times the area. That same year, we saw the lowest sea ice extent since monitoring began.
In fact, the meltwater ponds interfere with sea ice in two ways: a separate studyin Geophysical Research Abstractsshowed that the ponds also prevent the regrowth of sea ice in the winter by about one and a half months.
This is the first time meltwater ponds have been seriously incorporated into climate models – with major impact.
The study on refreezing rates showed that one fifth less sea ice formed when the ponds were taken into account.
Industrial opportunities and environmental apprehensions Sea ice is a major consideration for industries trying to operate in the seasonally frozen ocean. There is a short window of opportunity for operations dictated by the absence of ice, so knowing when and how extensive that window will be could be a crucial advantage.
But not everyone is pleased to know that industry has another tool at their disposal to make work in the Arctic easier. This week, 44 Greenpeace activists were arrested in Rotterdam while protesting the first shipment of oil from the Gazprom’s Prirazlomnoye platform in the Eastern Barents Sea. The NGO has been protesting oil development in the Arctic for years, with high-profile events like the one in Rotterdam intended to slow development in that sensitive ecosystem.
Industry such as shipping and oil and gas could benefit from more up-to-date information, but ice edge communities could suffer as a result if industry pushes too far (Photo: Jimmy Thomson)
Nils Boisen, the Arctic and northern areas advisor for World Wildlife Fund Norway, is pleased to hear of a new way to help shipping through Arctic waters proceed more safely. Plus, he adds, “it’s always good to have better methods to be able to model climate issues.”
But as for the oil and gas industry, which has been pushing its operations north against resistance from environmental groups, Boisen cautions that more information is not necessarily better. The industry is currently limited to drilling at the ice edge. Being able to predict where that ice edge will occur each year could push oil companies to move closer to the edge, a boundary on which a thriving ecosystem depends.
“A lot of the activities that they would like to conduct in the vicinity of the ice edge would have very detrimental effects on the ice edge ecology,” he says.
For now, however, the predictive ability of the meltwater ponds is limited to an overall sea ice extent: it can’t predict which regions will have more or less ice, only how much ice there will be in total. But the study opens the door to tighter predictions of the melting Arctic - for better or for worse.
RAAHE: Development Manager Juha Miikkulainen doesn’t think the current disagreements between EU and Moscow will affect Finland’s plans for Pyhäjoki nuclear power plant where Russia’s state nuclear corporation Rosatom is heavily involved.
Tourists will be replaced by soldiers and scientists on the North Pole this spring. Instead of the traditional Barneo ice camp, Russia is about to establish two bases – one for scientists and one for the military.
The overall goal for Norwegian Arctic Policy is to ensure that the current geopolitical tensions do not spill over and pose a challenge to peace and stability characterizing the region, says Foreign Minister Børge Brende.
How come that the Barents and the Balkan regions have nearly the same average life expectancy, but their GDPs are dramatically different? BarentsObserver compares two border regions trying to find an answer.
Terrorism fears, with police and soldiers likely targets, is the reason for the special decision to allow Finnish Border Guards to be armed when on patrol in the normally relaxed town of Kirkenes in Norway’s northeastern corner.
Eva Biaudet, Finland’s Non Discrimination Ombudsman says to BarentsObserver the rejection of the ratification of ILO Convention No. 169 was a step backwards for the political efforts to strengthen Sami rights.